NO ‘DUNGEONS” IN BAHRAIN

This morning I was infuriated by ridiculous allegations made by an NGO that claims to be run by academics. Everyone knows that academics weigh the positives and negatives, the pros and cons and all the empirical evidence presented to them and still come no conclusion. Without empirical evidence and thorough research, findings cannot be properly evaluated. So, I asked myself, why would a group of supposedly learned people publish a statement on Twitter which is not only far from the truth, but offensive and down right rude. It would be interesting to know what brought them to the conclusion that “dungeons” exist in Bahrain.

Presumably, the people who convinced this NGO believe that scholars would be credible advocates. However, it appears, judging by the inexplicable statement, that moral and ethical duties have been cast to the wind. Why would they be provoked into making such horrendously out of touch remarks against an entire country?  If it is because they are unaware and possibly ignorant of the facts, then I would like to share my personal experience over the last three decades in a country that I now call home. After all, the same group of people who crafted this shameful accusation have in the past accused me of being an agent and living the high life, purely because I am a British national. Contrary to their accusations, I work for a living, always have, and I presume I always will (unless I win the lottery of course). I drive a 14-year-old car that takes me to and from my several places of work. Additionally, I have not travelled since 2019 and probably will not be able to for a while. Over the last three decades I have seen this country develop and continue to work with several segments of the society. So, I am not a novice, I am not a stranger and I am not about to ignore people who have aligned themselves with extremists get away with throwing about unsubstantiated accusations against my home. 

The University and College Union (UCU) claimed that Dr. Abduljalil AlSingace is on hunger strike and is part of a pro-democracy group. This man has been arrested for his links to terrorist groups and is in fact one of the masterminds – I suppose his education was useful. One should not underestimate the influence of radical groups; they are formidable, organized, and have good financial backing.  Lastly, just to generate further thought – did it not strike our learned friends at the UCU that the leader of Hezbollah, Hasan Nasrallah has also rallied for this same doctor’s release? Why would someone like Nasrallah demand the release of Dr. AbdulJalil? Furthermore, it should be noted that the letter that is being heavily promoted by the same people who are pushing the latest article in the Independent. 

The main man voice in this fiasco is Sayed Alwadaei who is based in the UK and claims to be a Director at the Bahrain Institute of Rights and Democracy (BIRD). In 2016 he jumped on a car carrying the King of Bahrain in London – this is against all security protocol and unacceptable regardless of who is in the car and who jumps on it!  Alwadaei also continues to accuse the government of Bahrain of targeting his family. What he conveniently fails to mention is that his brother-in-law, his mother-in-law, and a cousin were all found guilty of planting a fake bomb in the Capital, Manama. In a recent article published in the Independent Ebtisam AlSaegh keeps up her claim that she was raped and mistreated during her arrest.  

In August 2017, Ebtisam’s husband confirmed that she had not discussed any misconduct with him. In fact, he thanked the authorities for taking the time to investigate complaints against officials and for protecting the rights and security of his wife and other convicts. Some may believe that she was frightened to tell her husband – but what about forensic evidence? If there is none – can someone be accused based purely on allegations?  In my experience of helping female domestic workers who have found themselves in unfortunate circumstances in Bahrain, I found both cooperation and support. One of my key findings that was deeply satisfying, was that none of the female detainees are handled by men. Women officers chaperone female prisoners throughout their incarceration which includes regular medical visits. The foreign women I have supported found the security personnel kind and reiterated that not only did they have privacy and regular meals, they were never alone with any male officer during their confinement. 

Thus, I would encourage those who have a tainted picture of Bahrain, to visit the country. It is important that they meet people who will offer them a factual and broader perspective of how diverse communities of people live safely in this country. 

Sally Saar 

20^th August 2021

COVID is not done with us.

• 

By default, we will be more resilient.

 “Hopefully we will use this crisis to rebuild, produce something better 

and more humane”, Simon Mair.  

Meanwhile, as people succumb to the virus, opponents of the big Pharma 

continue their campaign against the vaccine.

“All the coronaviruses (SARS, MERS, and COVID-19) are transmitted from bats with a secondary host. In SARS it was a cat, in MERS it was a camel, and COVID-19 is a pangolin, which is prized for its meat and used for traditional medicine in China. H1N1 was a hybrid from birds and cows”, Richard P. Wenzel, M.D., chair emeritus and professor of the Department of Internal Medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University’s School of Medicine. According to data, the first case was in Wuhan in December 2019 and on 16^th May 2021, 163,218,911 positive cases 3,384,824 deaths and 141,547,085 recovered were reported across the globe.  The worst outcome is “if we don’t vaccinate enough people and it mutates to remain pathogenic, killing thousands and thousands every year” John Wherry, Director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Pennsylvania.

Bahrain has been on top of the pandemic since the outset. Wearing a mask as well as social distancing is a small price to pay. Local authorities continue to encourage people to get vaccinated and not be lulled into a false sense of security with increased inoculations. Although many have taken the vaccine, many have thus far rejected all available vaccines. Apart from the obvious reason of staying alive, communities need to support each other. Not taking the vaccine puts others at risk.  We need to move forward – there is much to be done. 

The pandemic has been key to boosting innovation and technology. The exponential growth in technology adoption can be seen across education, businesses and within the home. However, while people become increasingly reliant on the internet and social media platforms, it has inadvertently provided an efficient platform and captive audience for propagandists.  Anti-vaxxers are using social media effectively to recruit millions around the world, indoctrinate them with fear and create a cloud of suspicion. As a result, the dissemination of disinformation and fake news shared across the globe at the click of a button has become a direct threat to public health.  According the CDCH (Center for Countering Digital Hate), “up to 65% of anti-vaccine content circulating on major social media networking sites is tied to 12 individuals”. This was based on an analysis of a sample of anti-vaccine content shared/posted on Facebook and Twitter over 812,000 times between February 1^st – March 16^th 2021”.  Apart from propagandists, lack of international coordination has meant people reacting slower to the seriousness of COVID-19: evident from the recent surge across the globe. 

COVID-19 has caused many challenges. In 2020, economists predicted overall global GDP would fall between 2.4 – 2.8%, indicating a worse economic crisis than in 2008-2009. However, the World Bank estimates a shrinkage of 5.2% in global economy in 2021. The health sector has undergone major transformation and more will follow in the future. Mental health needs post-pandemic will be enormous. Many countries will be forced to reassess critical care with outpatient treatment. Education has shifted to e-learning which may become a new standard. Some employees may prefer to work from home, as personal priorities change compelling employers to adapt.  IT giants have already given more access to public websites for cyber communication such as Zoom – thus, more businesses are communicating internationally. Even families and friends have become adept at using technology to keep in touch. Netflix has seen a major increase with people being confined in their homes. The biggest challenge for governments around the globe may come from the disenfranchised middle and working class. Many have lost their life-savings, jobs, homes, businesses and will have to start again as their long-term plans are shattered.  Looking down the barrel of months without pay and wondering where and when they may find work is soul destroying. As important as the youth are to any system, more mature and experienced members of society will be an integral part of change. Meanwhile, despite many succumbing to the virus, opponents of the big Pharma continue their deceptive campaign against the vaccine. 

Life after COVID-19 will be different.  Governments around the world will probably review deficiencies in their systems and policy making. Russia, US, UK, Germany, India and China are competing to produce enough vaccines. The inability of the WHO to predict a pandemic and the UN’s failure to respond with disaster mitigation will possibly be scrutinised. The lack of international coordination immediately after the outbreak will also be examined. Although some experts predict an end to globalisation and re-emergence of nationalisation, others posit the increase in unemployment will force people to cross borders in search of work. Every level in society has been and will be affected. By default, we will become more resilient. Nonetheless, the hope is the human race will develop a more humane and caring attitude – although judging by the ludicrous, vain and out-of-touch gobbledygook of many social media influencers – one wonders! 

Sally Saar

British MPs should focus on the increasing crime rate in the UK.

   What is wrong with British MPs? Why do they not focus on their own streets? They have had time to visit a man who supports terrorism in another country and is squatting outside a foreign embassy, claiming to be on hunger strike. There is freedom of expression and then there is false manipulated information that is being fed to the British public. It is an embarrassment that MPs Navendu Mishra, Dianne Abbot, Wendy Chamberlain, Apsana Begum, Paula Barker, Sir Peter Bottomley, have had time to visit a man whose allegiance is with a theocratic dictatorship and protests because members of his family who are involved in illegal violent crime in Bahrain are in prison. Sadly, even the Guardian, which is supposed to be the voice of truth has jumped on the bandwagon. One would think that MPs have a busy schedule and would spare more time to support constituencies with real challenges at this time of the year.  They should be addressing the pandemic, increased crimes including incidents of rape, the nearly one million poor older households struggling to pay heating bills and the death of several abused children due to negligence in Britain. However, their priority appears to be to waste British taxpayer money to show solidarity with a group of people who support a fanatical dictatorship. Is that what they want for the UK? Is it somehow in their interest to support individuals who are linked to terrorism and allow them a voice in the UK?

   “UKCrimeStats show that in July this year there were a total of 507,306 reported crimes, an increase of 7% compared to April’s 473,396. That’s an increase in reported crimes of a massive 33,862 ranging from Anti-Social Behaviour, Criminal Damage & Arson through to Burglaries and Robberies”. Crimes in England and Wales have gone up by 14,752 incidents between September 2020 and October 2021. Possessions of weapons have increased by 278 and violent crime by 6, 568 incidents. Based on these figures, one would think that this was of concern to the learned members of parliament instead of hanging out in London with a man who is a criminal in disguise. Just last week a man and women were jailed for life for the horrific act of brutality committed on a beautiful 6-year-old child that led to his untimely demise. His father’s girlfriend smashed the little boy’s head into a door and on the ground – they deprived him of food and tortured him. His grandmother and Uncle raised concerns of his well-being. Here is a cold-blooded act of murder that must be addressed to ensure it does not ever happen again: but it seems these MPS are swanning around London probably claiming allowances to sympathise with a criminal. Why do they not use this time to visit vulnerable families or social workers who can share the challenges they are facing? Why not visit doctors and nurses who are under immense pressure and have been working tirelessly during the virus? Why not visit business owners who are facing financial ruin? Additionally, on 4^th November, the UK Guardian reported and I quote: “Rape accounted for 37% of all sexual offences recorded by the police. The number of rape offences in the year ending June 2021 was the highest ever recorded annual figure to date (61,158 offences), said a report”.  With the surge in crime rates, one would imagine that these elected politicians would do what their constituency members voted for – that is look after their well-being.  

   As politicians who are involved in local governmental affairs, I wonder what Bahrain has to do with these British MPs? On the other hand, I would also strongly urge them to firstly, visit the country and second of all speak to expatriate communities that live and work freely in Bahrain. I have lived in Bahrain since 1989 and do not comprehend why British MPs would allow themselves to be manipulated by a group of people they do not even know. There are truthful sides to the story and the fact that these MPs are willing to compromise their personal and professional credibility makes one wonder how they can be objective in their roles as members of the UK parliament. 

Sally Saar

December 17, 2021

Unity Matters to Bahrain

It would appear that whatever the Bahrain government announces or establishes for the long-term betterment of the people is somehow belittled and torn to shreds without any evidence. Calling themselves the “opposition” has allowed them to manipulate the sympathy of individuals in the Western world who demonise the government including the elected parliament members and the voices of citizens and residents who live and work in Bahrain. The hope of these people is to totally appose anything the majority wants and with the financing by a foreign power continue rants on social media platforms. By some miracle they appear at every United Nations meeting (who’s paying?), online Forums and even in prominent Western print media. None of this is easy and requires astronomical funding. Perhaps it is not cool or trendy to like the country you live in and appreciate the freedom, security and safety it offers. Over the last few weeks, our dear “friends” in the UK have gained the ear of a handful of people in the British and EU parliament, a couple of academics and even a handful of people who oppose the opening of the Israeli Embassy in Manama. They fail to recognise that the Abraham Accord is a unification strategy designed by leaders who strive for peace and solidarity to create a better future for all. 

Another recent development was the introduction of the alternative penalties for offenders. This has been introduced so that those who may have committed minor crimes or addicted to substances can seek the support they need to work their way back into society and go on to live a normal life. At least, that is the hope. Of course, not even a move that is compassionate and categorically about integrating individuals who need an opportunity to discard the stigma that hangs over their head and lead a normal life can encourage people to commend the action. The alternative penalties’ emphasis is on resocialization and reintegration and not on retribution. Before going any further, I would like to inform Sir Peter Bottomley – MP – Conservative Father of the House of Commons, Worthing West that the man he is defending is one of the masterminds behind terrorist activities. Sir Peter should really do his homework before throwing around accusation of human rights abuse when all the evidence indicates that AbdulJalil Singcase who was the leader of AlHaq (a breakaway group from AlWefaq which was also aligned with Hezbollah) is not suffering and has been imprisoned for being linked to violent crimes.  There are several theories regarding alternative punishment based on empirical evidence. The first is the Deference Theory which proposes that alternative punishment or community service results in lower recidivism than imprisonment. Also, those who do reoffend may do so with less serious offences or perhaps at a lower rate. The Control Theory suggests that some individuals have a propensity towards committing crimes but once they have established strong bonds within society, they are able to restrain themselves from being involved in illegal activity against that same society. Finally, the labeling theory which includes deviant labelling and official labeling suggests that economic or social stigma may cause opportunities being blocked and isolation which can lead them to return to committing crimes. So, one can see that alternative punishment is fundamentally about encouraging minor offenders back into society so that they may build their future and become respected members of society again. So why the criticism and false allegations against a system that has proven to work perfectly well across the globe and will have positive outcomes for families. 

Why do groups fiercely condemn the reform process? Why do they continue to disparage the government and all those who support it? They turn to Westerners who refuse to acknowledge Iran’s quest for Arabian hegemony through duplicitly funding different groups. The Arab culture must be recognised and not judged on Western morals.  The fact of the matter is, Bahrain is a sovereign Arab nation that has continued to demonstrate its all-encompassing policies. The constitution states all are equal in the eyes of the law regardless of faith, gender or ethnicity: that’s what makes the country and people extraordinary. As a result within a few minutes in Manama, one can visit a Mosque, a Synagogue, a 200 year old Hindu Temple and a Church. There is history, there is culture, there is freedom and there is security for women and children. For those who have not been, come and visit before making outlandish remarks about our home.  

Sally Saar

30^th September 2021

Terrorism, Human Rights & NGOs

• 

Human Rights are universal and not intended to serve any distinct groups. 

Terrorism is a weapon used by the weak against the strong; Healthy funding is essential; the most logical action is to turn to business ventures through non-profit organisations. 

One would assume that people in politics have access to intelligence and will be aware of how organised criminal groups operate.  How and why are terrorist groups able to garner support from educated political voices against Bahrain? Where are the voices of objectivity?

 “Human Rights” is based on the Universal Declaration of Human rights (UDHR). Article 1 states, “it is freedom humans enjoy by virtue of their inherent rights based on dignity, equality and liberty”. Thus, it cannot be called a universal right if it only reflects the preference of a selected group of like-minded individuals. If it does, it then becomes inherently political, with the focus diverted to individualistic politics, as opposed to the original sentiment of the promotion of human rights. However, the term “Human Rights” continues to be exploited, with fundamental groups deliberately manipulating the term to covertly disguise a radical political agenda through organised crime. Ultimately “in meeting a threat, government has two basic alternatives, defence and deterrence”.  Hence, if a crime cannot be prevented, it is nevertheless important for authorities to identify, apprehend and prosecute criminals. With advances in technology, infiltrating terrorist/organised crime groups has become more challenging. For example; 1) ISIS recruit and train through social media and online platforms and 2) Hamas are known for using chatrooms, as well as disguising instructions, maps and explosive making guides inside graphic files. Radical messages are tailored so that they appeal to the target. Even more worrying, messages that glorify acts of terrorism with virtual successes through gaming, are modified purely to attract minors. 

Terrorist/gang recruitment processes offer a defined personal and social identity to members. Once an individual is accepted, grooming shapes their identity, personality and social behaviour. Each member must learn the group norms, belief values and communication methods. The group identity becomes the central defining element of that individual. For example, in 2014, Hezbollah Unit 3800 operatives which is modelled on Iran’s Quds force was found to be training the Houthi rebels in Yemen. Their only goal: to spread Iran’s hegemonic vision in the region. But foot soldiers have been conditioned to deem that Hezbollah’s purpose is “to carry on God will on earth, championed by the faithful”. Thus, group members are taught to normalise violent behaviour by using euphemistic language to dehumanise potential victims, as well as to morally disengage from the brutality. For example, Osama bin Laden referred to Americans as “Satan’s US troops” and US allies as “the devil’s supporters”. Captured members of Al Qaeda, when asked about suicide said “this is not suicide. Suicide is selfish, it reflects mental weakness. This is self-sacrifice in the name of God”. When asked about killing innocent people, they detach themselves: “I am not a murderer. A murderer is someone with a psychological problem; our actions have a goal … the group doesn’t do it because it wants to kill civilians, but because the jihad must go on”. This further indicates that group members are trained in distorting the relationship between action and effect and are able to displace responsibility. Another example was in 2011, when terrorist cells in Bahrain murdered police officers by driving over them multiple times. Their social media networks deliberately distorted images and their spokespersons claimed the cars had driven over dolls! Another example was the torture/murder of migrant workers, denying access to the largest government hospital and holding patients of certain ethnicity hostage was considered acceptable, as they have a different philosophy.

The word terrorism comes from the Latin word “terre” which means to frighten. The leader of a group is the catalyst for terrorist and criminal activities. Most organisations have a clear structure of command/management and instructions are followed because like-minded people have been recruited, indoctrinated and converted to fight for a “cause”. They may also undergo paramilitary/military training to further embolden the “cause” and inspire unconditional loyalty. Methods such as, intergroup and intragroup competitiveness preserve foot soldiers’ desperation to please their masters. Thus, it is evident that, healthy funding is essential for travel, to buy weapons, media space, recruit political influencers, secure voices of disruption as well as continue to increase outreach.  Turning to traditional crime is not an option, as it may draw the undesirable attention of authorities. Therefore, the most logical action is business ventures through non-profit organisations and religious groups to legitimise the “cause”. Positive framing techniques on social media attracts support. They are ingenious in legitimatising misinformation with diverse labels, styles and tactics, to gain access to credible organisations and attract sympathetic financiers, academics and media.  Furthermore, these groups firmly implant the narrative of their ideology by adapting it to suit targeted groups. It should be noted; internally, they do not deviate from the common ideology and goal as set by the commander. Consequently, well-structured NGOs are formed (financed by passive supporters and other entities) to offer logistical support, media, employment, travel documentation, access to public meetings and training. 

Politicians in Belgium, Spain, UK, Germany, Italy, Holland, USA and elsewhere who sympathise with individuals claiming “human rights” have been abused in Bahrain should scratch below the surface. It is their duty as officials to expose the genuine “cause” concealed by false propaganda. It is in everyone’s interest to eradicate violent terrorism.  It makes no sense for people in power to support and repeat a false emotive narrative against any sovereign state when evidence of radical manipulation is clear. Regardless of where you live, your ethnicity, faith, nationality, gender or ability: Human Rights are universal and not intended to serve distinct groups of fanatics.

To keep activities in check, terrorist groups normally have a hierarchal structure with a solid chain of command. Counter terrorist specialists proposed four levels within organised crime groups; 1) the command centre – usually well-educated planners, 2) active cadre – the hard-core field soldiers who may know other members exist but the only information they have is their own mission, 3) active supporters – to take care of logistics and gather intelligence, 4) the passive supporters – for political and financial support. Each layer usually operates on a “need to know” basis and smaller cells are planted across different geographic regions to achieve the objectives of the mission. The bosses sustain group morale through member dependence (such as a regular supply of illicit substances or financial rewards). These groups often use a mutual language such as tattoos, graffiti, finger-nail polish, logos, flags, codes, not only to transfer messages but to also advertise affiliation. Therefore, enabling communication with other members with pronounced efficiency, even if institutionalised. To make matters more complex, once a crime has been committed, leaders may regroup the factions and introduce new strategies to garner further support – thus making it more difficult to identify drivers.  Experts within their teams further enhance the mission by forming multi-channel networks and intricate decentralisation, making it complicated to infiltrate these groups: and so the fight to eliminate terrorism continues…..

Sally Saar

Al Jazeera and its Echo Chambers

Rumours can become irrefutable “fact” particularly if doctored “evidence” and emotional lines are used by the preparators. Thus, propaganda artists, set out to use media channels that will offer them the widest reach. Qatari owned Al Jazeera promotes itself as an independent and factual media channel, but continues deceitfulness by creating and publishing deceptive content.  Additionally, disengaged personnel have abandoned this channel due to unethical demands made upon them to be politically biased.  

The advent of social media and other technological advances have transformed communication. However, they have also become the core source of amplifying duplicity and decontextualizing content.  In fact, when accurate information makes a preview – vindicating voices with a bigger outreach use socio-technical features and intricately designed platforms to spread deceitful content to maintain deceptive campaigns. All of which required a great deal of funding. Shift in public perception through distortion has influenced the “echo chamber and filter bubbles” hypothesis whereby social media developers match content and users actively seek and share aligned views. Furthermore, information can be downloaded, edited and reuploaded repeatedly to preserve the falsehood required. 

The notable impact of this can be seen when European Parliamentarians are recruited as “credible experts” to echo a false narrative presented to them by a group who have a very specific agenda. It is appalling that Western politicians use their pulpit to abandon the issues within their own constituency to focus on a sovereign state in the Arabian Gulf with a population of 1.2 million people of all faiths and ethnicities. Al Jazeera has become another medium of this group of people to create further skepticism and mistrust against Bahrain. The volume of false reporting by these agents is persistent; social media tools contribute in galvanizing false rhetoric across many frontiers. 

The European Prison Observatory report of 8 countries (France, United Kingdom, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Poland, Portugal and Spain), identified underperformances that necessitate urgent attention as they do not follow instructions as stated in the European Prison Rules. In the case of the outbreak of a contagious disease, the European Prison Rules are very clear. During a salmonellosis outbreak in Barczewo Prison in Poland, 68 prisoners and wardens became sick and authorities took several measures which included; “special meals, regular disinfection of kitchen, laundry and toilets in cells, training for staff and prisoners, etc.,”. They also suspended phone calls, walks, cultural activities and transports.  On 28^th January 2021, there was an outbreak of COVID-19 in the Truel prison, in the city of Aragon in Eastern Spain. Reports claimed that 104 of the 185 prisoners at the facility had tested positive with many suffering severe symptoms. Two staff were also placed in quarantine and isolation restrictions were put into place which prohibited the prisoners using the courtyard or communal areas. In addition to this, workshops family visitations and educational classes were suspended.  At around the same time, Picassent prison in Valencia announced the suspension of all non-essential activities, after reporting a second coronavirus outbreak, bringing the number of inmates infected to 157. As a result, 425 prisoners were placed in isolation while awaiting test results.  

Thus, it would appear that prisons across Europe are not obliged to release prisoners due to an outbreak of a disease. On the contrary, further restrictions are put into place for the safety of prisoners and all who work there. Men and women that are convicted of a crime and imprisoned, must serve their sentence. The people referred to as “prisoners of conscience” in Bahrain by HRW have been involved in criminal activity and terrorism. Their sentences are based on an independent judicial decision and forensic evidence. Therefore, just as Bahrain does not interfere with other sovereign states, perhaps the same respect would be extended. It is unacceptable to politicise human rights and make unsubstantiated statements based purely on misleading emotive propaganda fashioned by a group of people who have a precise agenda against the people of Bahrain. 

There are other concerns reported by the European Prison Observatory regarding the health of prisoners. For example, those who have injuries upon arrival or sustained them in prison are not recorded correctly and, in many cases, not recorded at all. Due to an unwillingness of medical professionals to work in some prisons, the first visit takes place after a few days and consists of a few questions often without a comprehensive physical check-up. The cells and areas for common activities do not meet hygiene and health requirements. Additionally, in many facilities, access to showers is not guaranteed and hot water is not always available.  Many prisoners also do not receive personal hygiene products such as soap and general cleaning implements and women’s sanitary needs are often not respected. In 2012 many prisoners struggling with mental health issues committed suicide. In France, 123, in Greece, 40, in Italy, 60, in Latvia, 7, in Poland, 18 and in Portugal, 16.  In Spain, there were 164 deaths and 23 suicides. In the UK there were 58 suicides. The data for juvenile prisoners’ deaths and suicide is not available for Greece, Portugal and Spain. 

So, it would appear that there is a lot to do in Europe. As for Qatar and its human rights record – that’s for another day. 

Sally Saar 

“A golden opportunity for peace, security and prosperity”.

(Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP)

The Abraham Accord was signed on 15^th September 2020 at the Whitehouse by Israel, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, and the United States. It is a peace process and a major achievement for all involved. Three months later, on December 22^nd 2020 Morocco signed a full normalisation agreement with Israel. A sound accomplishment and one that will propel all the partners to foster stronger relations and growth in trade, technology, food production, education and much more. As expected, some are critical, others unsure and many sceptical of this accomplishment. Everything suggests that the Abraham Accord is a strong show of camaraderie between nations that can only result in peace and security. In addition to this, one can already see the cultural opportunities with the Crossroads of Civilisation Museum in Dubai and new kosher food restaurants in Bahrain, Abu Dhabi and Dubai.  It is delightful to see that with this agreement, the youth in this region can look forward to an even brighter future with stability and security firmly in place. Who could ask for more from the people leading these countries. This powerful association can further propel and promote peace, stability and tolerance. 

The torment that continues to plague Middle Eastern countries and Europe is ultimately Iran! A brief look at merely the last ten tumultuous ten years of those who instigate violence may shed some light. Libya since the downfall of Gaddafi is devastated by Islamic terrorist groups. Syria’s civil conflict has left over half a million dead and millions suffering as refugees. Terrorists have occupied eastern Syria and waged jihadist attacks on the rest of the world. The UN reported that ISIS control over 10,000 fighters in cells in Syria and Iraq and are also targeting the Sahel nations in Africa. Let’s not forget that these same groups of extremists killed 22 and wounded 800 in Manchester in 2017 and killed 52 and wounded 700 in London in 2017.  Meanwhile, an Iranian government official is being tried in Belgium for a planned attack in Paris planned in 2018. The failed plan had targeted 80,000 supporters of the National Council of Resistance of Iran. In fact, 3 metric tonnes of the same type of explosives used in previous attacks were found stockpiled in North London.  Similar attacks were foiled in Cyprus, Thailand, Germany, Denmark and Albania – all linked to the Iranian regime. One would assume that Europeans have found themselves locked into an uncomfortable and potentially dangerous nuclear agreement. Particularly, since the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recently stated “samples taken from two sites during inspections in the fall by the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) contained traces of radioactive material”. This suggests that ongoing work on nuclear weapons in Turquz Abad may be a clandestine reality since 2015.  The Iranian Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) has been designated by the US state Department as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation. The same organisation as claimed by an influential Iranian cleric conducted a failed attack in 2019 on a nuclear facility in Abu Dhabi.  On 10^th February of this year a Houthis strike on Abha International Airport caused a civilian plane to catch fire on the tarmac and in 2017 a target reached Riyadh International airport. After an attack on Saudi Arabia’s oil processing plant in September 2017, an Iranian national newspaper called Kayhan boasted “the Houthis fired a missile into Riyadh. Dubai is next.” As if that is not enough, a bronze statue of the late Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani was unveiled in Beirut! In addition to this, tentacles have been noted in South America, which could conceivably be a security challenge in the near future.  Meanwhile, the newly elected US administration is showing a willingness towards the Nuclear deal and also reviewing the Houthis file; ignoring the UN annual report that already revealed that the Houthis are being armed and trained by the IRGC.  But, the pressure is on. As reported by the UK Guardian: Iran has been surprised by how long Biden has taken to construct a specific offer, and Zarif has warned: “They will soon realise time is not in their favour”.  So, while the newly elected American president struggles with domestic racism and extremism, one can only hope that he also fortifies a stance against those who stoke the fire of division and extremism.  

It is without a doubt that people do not and cannot change their perspective instantaneously. Nonetheless, civil society has the potential to be strengthened through genuine communication, dialogue and education. Economic and geopolitical interests may not guarantee understanding, but effective discourse with mutual respect can pave the way for genuine peace. The Abraham Accord is a commendable achievement; it brings hope that the world can be enriched for upcoming generations. “What was only dreamed of a few years ago is now achievable, and we can see before us a golden opportunity for peace, security and prosperity for our region” Abdullatif Al-Zayani, Bahrain Foreign Minister.

Sally Saar

18^th February 2021

Thank you MOI – my experience with Bahrain Police.

Bahrain continues to be the target of self-proclaimed activists residing in the West.  They have forgotten their crimes and have chosen to live a comfortable life outside of their home country. So why are they preoccupied with lashing out inaccurate allegations against a country they chose to leave?  The people that publish unsubstantiated reports in foreign publications have not spoken, interviewed or approached an ordinary citizen or resident. Thus, rather disappointingly, rendering their role into a mere political tool.  

In light of these bizarre accusations, I would like to share my experience with the police in Bahrain. Last year (2020), the country offered amnesty to workers to normalise their situation in Bahrain by allowing workers to renew their visas or to return to their country without paying any fines. Many decided to stay. In the middle of December, I was informed of four ladies whose documentation had expired but wanted to stay. My decision to help them, gave me an understanding of the roles of all the parties involved. The situation for three of these ladies was straight forward and their process was completed within a couple of weeks.  One, however, was detained for a longer period of time because her situation was somewhat more complicated. Being totally clueless, I approached the head of the police station where she was detained to seek clarity. I did not know what to expect. Thankfully, I was allowed inside and found the head of the station extremely gracious. He took the time to explain the procedure, why she was detained and what would happen next.  Eventually the lady was released and she too is in the process of normalising her situation.

As I have not had any involvement with the police, out of curiosity, I asked each about their experience at the different detention centres. None of them had any complaints and infact were very complimentary. They said, not once were they handled by male officers and would even have to wait for a lady officer if they needed to be transported anywhere such as the medical clinic or the public prosecution court. All were first taken for a check-up which included a COVID-19 check and allowed to join the others following the results. These ladies informed me that the centres were clean, there was running hot and cold water and fresh food three times a day! They also informed me that the medication they needed was administered free of charge and in a timely manner. Based on my personal experience, I would like to extend my appreciation to the Head of the Police station that I visited. He and his entire team were kind, patient and courteous at all times. Without their assistance and guidance, I may have been completely lost. This I believe is an accurate reflection of the Bahrain police bearing in mind that these ladies are neither high-profile nor on any of our ‘international friends’ radar!  

For the record, in Bahrain, any citizen, expatriate, or visitor may file a complaint to the Directorate of Internal Investigations if they believe that they have been the victim of misconduct in any form by a Ministry of the Interior employee. In addition to this the National Institute of Human Rights in Bahrain is responsible for the human rights and development of policies with regards to the protection of human rights in the country.  

Sally Saar

7^th February 2021– . 

Goodbye, 2020……..

2020 started out as usual. January, as always, was busy for everyone getting over the holiday period and get back into work mode. February was super special for me, as my entire family descended on my tiny apartment to help me organize a surprise bash for my father’s 90^th birthday.  By the middle of February, schools were closed and everything began to change.  There was a feeling of uneasiness in the air. From then on, unprecedented waves of happiness and curiosity have left many of us exhausted, perplexed and awaiting the new year with urgency and hope. But overall, Bahrain has been more successful at alleviating public fears and challenges than most places around the world. 

The Government Task force led by the Crown Prince and Prime Minister since the outset continues with astonishing precautions. Further evidence of the government’s support for the wellbeing of the people; perhaps international media should note that the government of Bahrain was one of the first countries in the world to adopt appropriate models of communication with the public. Since March, a risk communication strategy to safeguard citizens and residents has been implemented that included,  1) tailored risk communication that resonated with all communities, 2) built public trust through transparency and partnerships with relevant authorities, 3) tested risk communication under conditions of stress and urgency, 4) conducted immediate studies to fill any gaps of information, 5) used all tools of communication, print, online, social media, radio, television, face to face etc, 6) regular press briefings that were aired live for all to follow, 7) created an application to real time updates, 8) created an integrated communications plan in multiple languages that reached all segments in society, 9) addressed economic challenges. Vaccinations are being offered free of charge to everyone living in the country and inclusive COVID-19 checks have been carried out since March2020. Probably one of the most significant facets of Bahrain government’s achievements is the involvement of lay voices as well as experts in the field. Apart from the phenomenal work by medics, the police force has been incredibly effective in ensuring that everyone follows safety measures.  Bahrain’s results speak for themselves. 

An amnesty for irregular migrants was announced in April by the Labour Market Regulatory Authority (LMRA) and expired on December 31, 2020. This opportunity gave irregular workers the opportunity to normalize their residency status or leave the country without any fines. The newspapers announced that the Philippines, Indian, Bangladesh and Thailand Embassy had urged and supported their nationals to accept this compassionate gesture and legalize their status. The Philippine President also wrote to the King and reiterated the gracious care bestowed upon the expatriate communities. 

The Abraham Accord has propelled the region into further peace and stability with rewarding official visits by officials. Those who doubt this historic move, should remind themselves that King Hamad clearly stated at the UN General Assembly on Sept. 24 2020, “We consider this a cornerstone for achieving a just and comprehensive peace leading to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, with East Jerusalem as its capital.”

In sports, a remarkable gesture by the government was commending the efforts of frontline workers, with a special invitation to attend the Bahrain Grand Prix. A noteworthy approach to acknowledge those who have risked their own well-being and sacrificed being with their families. The national gratitude showered upon them has been a phenomenal boost of confidence and acknowledgement. 

The annual IISS Manama Dialogue took place in December focusing on the geopolitical issue of aggression and terrorist actions by cells of Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood which have grown and strengthened across the world and especially in Europe.

The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released their 2020 report which was mostly positive but a couple of points were misleading. Firstly, the ‘spike’ as reported by ‘analysts’ suggests that the figures may be woolly. However, all recorded figures in Bahrain are based on contact details and the whereabouts of people – so it is clear that the movements of each individual who tests positive are known. Secondly, the amazing Onam celebrations should have been commended as it showcased multi-cultural unity. Thirdly, when it comes to religious slurs and other allegations – perhaps it is best to leave that to experts, rather than link social media posts by people who obviously prefer to overlook accuracy. The report also failed to mention that the largest catholic cathedral in the Gulf will be inaugurated in Bahrain. This is another testament of the longstanding tradition of sincerity and acceptance of all faiths in the country. In fact, I have always found it fascinating that the Churches, the 200-year-old Krishna Temple and the Synagogue are side by side Mosques in the centre of Manama – all within walking distance!

2020 has been a challenging year for all of us. As we enter a new decade, let us hope that media cease entertaining those who promote, violence and fragmentation of society. Humanity needs unity, it is in dire need of a unified peaceful vision.

Sally Saar

5^th January 2021

Lesser of Two Evils

“The Thalidomide saga, which stretched over ten years and succeeded eventually in winning proper compensation for victims of the drug, was a monumental achievement, legally, politically, and journalistically”, wrote Magnus Linklater, Prospect (2001). Sir Evans (former Editor of the Sunday Times), was relentless in attaining justice through emotive campaigns and publishing articles until the victims voices were heard. Sir Evans clearly demonstrated the power of the media.

Between 1957 – 1962, a drug called thalidomide was prescribed to pregnant women to counter morning sickness. It was launched in Germany and marketed in 46 countries by 1960. The drug was advertised as being completely safe “even during pregnancy.” By 1961, a medical doctor called Dr. McBride realised that this “drug interfered with the babies’ normal development, causing many of them to be born with phocomelia, resulting in shortened, absent, or flipper-like limbs”. Some children were born without ears, blind or with other complications. They were consequently shunned by society. Despite many challenges, Sir Evans’ investigations discovered that the drug “a nerve suppressant which induced a euphoric feeling, was first developed to combat nerve gas during the second world war and was tested on camp prisoners” (Vanessa Thorpe, 2016). Due to the extraordinary commitment of Sir Harold Evans, Thalidomide was banned in 1962.

I was intrigued by a column on Saturday, 29^th August in the GDN by Gordon Boyle, entitled “Fascinating study about narcissism” which concluded “the worry for the world must be another four years of Donald Trump as the president of the US”.  Narcissists, psychopaths and sociopaths are described as devious people without remorse – but can be exceptionally manipulative and charismatic; the nurture versus nature debate continues. Many research papers suggest countless powerful, wealthy and social media influencers have those self-absorbed tendencies. One can see that during the current challenges, while many are losing jobs, homes and businesses, social media influencers (apparently in self-imposed denial or oblivious to the plight of thousands) persistently publish superficial posts of privileged lives without much reflection. I am not an expert on American politics, however, was it not US meddling and deceit by the previous administration that has led to upheaval in the Middle East?  Was it not Blaire and Bush who initiated the annihilation of Iraq, followed by more devastation instigated by Clinton and later Obama? Are they not responsible for the rise and funding of terrorist groups such as ISIS, Taliban, Hezbollah and for supporting the so called “Arab Spring” through the offices of George Soros?